Sunday, July 19, 2009

The GOP Sotomeyor perspective....

Yes, the GOP would have us believe anyone who is not a white guy in a tie, is a real oddball for a Supreme Court justice.

Maureen Dowd wrote this editorial: (Excerpts)

You can’t judge a judge by her cover.
A wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not know that a gaggle of white Republican men afraid of extinction are out to trip her up.
After all, these guys have never needed to speak inspirational words to others like them, as Sotomayor has done. They’ve had codes, handshakes and clubs to do that.
So when Republican Senator Jon Kyl, without so much as a howdy-do, went at Sotomayor, and soon was asking her if she agreed with Barack Obama’s contention, when he voted against John Roberts, that a judge’s heart is important, the would-be justice was as adroit as her idol Nancy Drew.
“No, sir,” she said, indicating that the only bleeding-heart thing about her was the color of her jacket. She added that “it’s not the heart that compels conclusions in cases. It’s the law.”
President Obama wants Sotomayor, naturally, to bring a fresh perspective to the court. It was a disgrace that W. appointed two white men to a court stocked with white men. And Sotomayor made it clear that she provides some spicy seasoning to a bench when she said in a speech: “I simply do not know exactly what the difference will be in my judging, but I accept there will be some based on gender and my Latina heritage.”
The judge’s full retreat from the notion that a different life experience is valuable was more than necessary and somewhat disappointing. But, as any clever job applicant knows, you must obscure as well as reveal, so she sidestepped the dreaded empathy questions — even though that’s why the president wants her.
“We apply law to facts,” she told Kyl. “We don’t apply feelings to facts.”

“The law requires some finality,” Sotomayor explained about her case, with an iciness that must have sent a chill up the conservative leg of Alabama’s Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, even as it left Obama hanging out on an empathy limb.
Republican Lindsey Graham read Sotomayor some anonymous comments made by lawyers about her, complaining that she was “temperamental,” “nasty,” “a bit of a bully.” Then he patronizingly lectured her about how this was the moment for “self-reflection.” Maybe Graham thinks Nino Scalia has those traits covered.
But the barbed adjectives didn’t match the muted performance on display before the Judiciary Committee. Like the president who picked her, Sotomayor has been a model of professorial rationality. Besides, it’s delicious watching Republicans go after Democrats for being too emotional and irrational given the G.O.P. shame spiral.
W. and Dick Cheney made all their bad decisions about Iraq, W.M.D.’s, domestic surveillance, torture, rendition and secret hit squads from the gut, based on false intuitions, fear, paranoia and revenge.
Sarah Palin is the definition of irrational, a volatile and scattered country-music queen without the music. Her Republican fans defend her lack of application and intellect, happy to settle for her emotional electricity.
Senator Graham said Sotomayor would be confirmed unless she had “a meltdown” — a word applied mostly to women and toddlers until Mark Sanford proudly took ownership of it when he was judged about the wisdom of his Latina woman.
And then there’s the Supreme Court, of course, which gave up its claim to rational neutrality when the justices appointed by Republican presidents — including Bush Sr. — ignored what was fair to make a sentimental choice and throw the 2000 election to W.
Faced with that warped case of supreme empathy, no wonder Sotomayor is so eager to follow the law."

Sessions Sucketh


nonnie9999 said...

the hearings were misogyny and racism and ignorance on display. i wish that the dems on the committee had called the rethugs on their double standards.

Fran said...

So blind--- Clearly the new Dem president is not going to put up more if the same cookie cutter candidate as we've been stuck w in the Bush & Reagan era appointees-- although Sandra Day O'Connor turned out to be the voice of reason.

WE need diversity!

So I hope Sotomayor is confirmed.
They better start looking for another judge too, as Bader Ginsberg is probably going to retire due to heath concerns & is smart enough to do so while we have a progressive president.

D.K. Raed said...

I can't believe they are even putting up a fight. Sotomayor is about as moderate as they come. Let's just hope she doesn't pull a Souter (remember, GHWB & the repugs thought he was a like-minded conservative).

oh, when Maureen Dowd is on, she is really on! I just loved this little gem: "Sarah Palin is the definition of irrational, a volatile and scattered country-music queen without the music." Cue: achy-breaky heartstrings!

Fran said...

That was sooooo funny that line about Palin..... but also the barb about the Supreme court throwing the election in 2000 to the shrub.

I hope she turns out to seem moderate, but turns out to be radical liberal.
Hehe.... one can hope.

Christopher said...


My favorite was Miss Lindsey Graham. She made a damn fool of herself in the hearings.

I just wanted to slap her up along side her head when she started with the "you're a bully" diss of Judge Sotomayor.